Politics in Early Childhood Education

I attended the Central Ohio Candidate Forum sponsored by the child advocacy group groundWork. I wasn't sure what to expect so everything was a new idea to me. I thought it was well organized and it was definitely worth my time. Thirteen candidates for the Ohio House and Senate representing 15 districts were on the panel (not all districts were represented).

The moderator asked each candidate to prioritize access, quality, and funding as it relates to early childhood. Hughes (D16) said it was like asking him if he wanted his arm, head, or legs to be amputated. I have to say that was my first thought. Harris (D19) gave each attribute equal importance. Most selected access or funding. I was surprised that no one chose quality. Quality was discussed as the forum continued but it was not selected as a priority.

Rankin (D24) acknowledged the facilities surrounding his home were varied from "doghouse" to "palatial." It is good to hear that candidates are seeing the injustice. Now we need action. Rankin claims that he has heard all the support he is hearing tonight but nothing has happened. He is running against the incumbent Celeste (D24). As Rankin was talking about little to no action Celeste was turning red and holding his head. I interpreted the body language to say he was feeling embarrassed and chagrined. Celeste is the Kennedy of Ohio. Both men seemed arrogant but perhaps it takes one to beat one. Rankin would get my vote if I were in District 24.

I would also vote for Grossman based on a single comment. She talked about needing the entire community to help with the problems in the schools; teachers cannot do it all. IMO - Someone needs to understand that and do something about it. Teachers really cannot do it all. Teachers are key players in the life of a child and can initiate forms of support and intervention; but, they themselves need support. Teachers need to be able to depend on the community for the help they need.

I would vote for Weddington (D27). His motto seemed to be "all children need a choice, not a chance," He emphasized cultural differences and the need for sensitivity. Of all the candidates I was the most impressed with his remarks. They revealed a deeper level of understanding than some of the other candidates.

Early childhood decisions are only one area in which a legislator works. And of course no one is against little kids. I left the meeting wondering who among the panel were the true champions of children. Which candidates would vote to cut spending on early childhood programs in order to shift money to another need? What are these candidates telling other interest groups? Which candidate really will get the job done for Ohio's children? GO VOTE IN NOVEMBER!!